The Patrick Matthew Violin
The Patrick Matthew Scottish heritage violin will be completed in 2023. More details will follow here and in the national and international press.
ChatGPT A.I. has composed a poem about the making of The Patrick Matthew Violin (September 2023)
A song has been written to be played to the tune of "Scots Wha Hae" by Robert Burns, taking form and influence from that song, along with the story of Charels Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of "The Natural Process of Selection."
"You Who Lie With Darwin"
(AKA "The Patrick Matthew Song"),
You who lie with Darwin dead,
Who Alfred Wallace astray led,
Welcome to your muddled head,
Theory thievery.
Yesterday's the day, not now the hour,
See the face of Darwin dour,
See approach old Linnean power,
Lies and plagiary.
You are just a fraudster's knave!
You will fill a dullard's grave!
Nothing but a liar's slave!
Full of credulity.
It's Patrick Matthew's Natural law,
Facts and empirical data draw,
Truth not Darwin's spin of yore!
Why not follow me?
Darwin lied and Darwin stole!
Alfred Wallace's same role!
BigData down their rabbit hole,
Found dysology!
Lay the theory stealers low!
Myths fall, facts their foe!
Matthew's words in every blow!
It's Scotland's theory!!!
(By Mike Sutton January 14th 2023).
Archived HERE
"You Who Lie With Darwin"
(AKA "The Patrick Matthew Song" with narration),
This performance arrangement of the stanza "You Who Lie With Darwin" song
by Mike "The Godless" Sutton is to accompanied by violin.
"You Who Lie With Darwin"
(AKA "The Patrick Matthew Song"
To the tune of "Scots Wha Hae")
You who lie with Darwin dead,
Who Alfred Wallace astray led,
Welcome to your muddled head,
Theory thievery.
Yesterday's the day, not now the hour,
See the face of Darwin dour,
See approach old Linnean power,
Lies and plagiary.
You are just a fraudster's knave!
You will fill a dullard's grave!
Nothing but a liar's slave!
Full of credulity.
It's Patrick Matthew's Natural law,
Facts and empirical data draw,
Truth not Darwin's spin of yore!
Why not follow me?
Darwin lied and Darwin stole!
Alfred Wallace's same role!
BigData down their rabbit hole,
Found dysology!
Lay the theory stealers low!
Myths fall, facts their foe!
Matthew's words in every blow!
It's Scotland's theory!!!
Arrangement and part composition by Mike Sutton January 14th and 15th 2023. (DATE ARCHIVED HERE)
Other great performances of Scots Wha Hae (the Stanza by Robert Burns)
Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZiUHG2u4G0
Here https://youtu.be/WgskbClWZ68?t=1
Here https://youtu.be/o5kE3of1Lzo?t=2
Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8x3-wqSVV7U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGUxiauBr6U
(Narration)
‘… if the first description was originally imperfect, & had been superseded by any better description, it would perhaps be better to omit all reference to it, for the sooner such an author’s name was buried in oblivion the better.’
(Charles Darwin 1849)
(Narration)
‘This discovery recently published by Mr. Darwin turns out to be what I published very fully... as far back as January 1, 1831... reviewed in numerous periodicals, so as to have full publicity...by Loudon…and repeatedly in the United Service Magazine for 1831 etc.’
(Patrick Matthew 1860)
(Narration)
‘I think that no one will feel surprised that neither I, nor apparently any other naturalist,had heard of Mr Matthew’s views…’
(Charles Darwin 1860a)
(Narration)
‘I notice in your Number of April 21 Mr. Darwin’s letter honourably acknowledging my prior claim relative to the origin of species. I have not the least doubt that, in publishing his late work, he believed he was the first discoverer of this law of Nature. He is however wrong in thinking that no naturalist was aware of the previous discovery. I had occasion some 15 years ago to be conversing with a naturalist, a professor of a celebrated university, and he told me he had been reading my work “Naval Timber,” but that he could not bring such views before his class or uphold them publicly from fear of the cutty-stool, a sort of pillory punishment, not in the market-place and not devised for this offence, but generally practised a little more than half a century ago. It was at least in part this spirit of resistance to scientific doctrine that caused my work to be voted unfit for the public library of the fair city itself. The age was not ripe for such ideas, nor do I believe is the present one,..’
(Patrick Matthew 1860a, p.433).
(Narration)
‘…an obscure writer on Forest Trees, in 1830, in Scotland, most expressly & clearly anticipated my views — though he put the case so briefly, that no single person ever noticed the scattered passages in his book…’
(Charles Darwin 1861a)
‘Unfortunately the view was given by Mr. Matthew very briefly in scattered passages in an Appendix to a work on a different subject, so that it remained unnoticed until Mr. Matthew himself drew attention to it in The Gardeners’ Chronicle, on April 7th,
1860.’
(Charles Darwin, 1861, p.xv)
(Narration)
"...on what is termed Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection, but which theory was published by me about thirty years before Darwin (honourably acknowledged in his last edition by Darwin) at a time when man was scarcely ready for such thoughts, I surely had the best right to be heard upon this subject. Yet others were allowed to speak upon it, and its parent denied to do so. Such is the conduct of a Society terming itself the British Association for the Advancement of Science."
Matthew (1867) the Dundee Advertiser . September 12.
Click to see another Matthew v Darwin song. This is a blues number entitled Darwin The Kidnapper
Further reading on the Charles Darwin and Patrick Matthew Supermyth can be found on Supermyths.com HERE
THE ANSWER IS 30
And so we see that the science problem of Darwin's and Wallace's claim of miraculous virgin brained dual independent conception of a prior published theory, which both admitted was essentially the same as their own, and which Wallace wrote was even more complete, is solved by disproving the consensus that 0 people read Matthew's theory before they replicated it. Hence, any notion that mysterious forces govern the affairs of humans with otherwise amazing improbable coincidences is disproven in this case. The solution to this particular virgin conception problem is 30, which is the difference between 0 and 30. Hence, there were 30 routes for knowledge contamination to directly or indirectly prior-impregnate the brains of Darwin and Wallace with Matthew's bombshell breakthrough before they replicated it and then each claimed it as their own original idea.
From this example, we can learn how to solve the science problem of the Christian belief claim in the virgin conception of Mary with Jesus. All we need to find out is how many probably fertile human males were in a position to impregnate her.