Book Reviews of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory"
Review by Ton Munnich "More evidence from Sutton" on Goodreads (archived here) and Amazon Netherlands (archived here) On Ton Munnich's website "Sutton's book" (here) (Archived here)
Review by David Parkin "We may have to rethink our preconceptions about Darwin and his work" on Amazon (archived here)
Review by HBK (AKA Ian Hardie) "Darwin - the case for plagarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory of Natuaral Selection" On Amazon (archived here) On Goodreads (here) (archived here)
Review by Catherine Philips "A fascinating read" On Amazon (archived here) On Goodreads (archived here)
Review by Leon McNair (AKA The Kilted Scotsman) on Goodreads (here) Archived (here)
Further reading on the Charles Darwin and Patrick Matthew Supermyth can be found on Supermyths.com HERE
THE ANSWER IS 30
And so we see that the science problem of Darwin's and Wallace's claim of miraculous virgin brained dual independent conception of a prior published theory, which both admitted was essentially the same as their own, and which Wallace wrote was even more complete, is solved by disproving the consensus that 0 people read Matthew's theory before they replicated it. Hence, any notion that mysterious forces govern the affairs of humans with otherwise amazing improbable coincidences is disproven in this case. The solution to this particular virgin conception problem is 30, which is the difference between 0 and 30. Hence, there were 30 routes for knowledge contamination to directly or indirectly prior-impregnate the brains of Darwin and Wallace with Matthew's bombshell breakthrough before they replicated it and then each claimed it as their own original idea.
From this example, we can learn how to solve the science problem of the Christian belief claim in the virgin conception of Mary with Jesus. All we need to find out is how many probably fertile human males were in a position to impregnate her.